ABSTRACT
Introduction Nuvaxovid became available in Australia from February 2022, a year later than the first COVID-19 vaccines were released. It was a much-anticipated alternative vaccine for people that had either suffered an adverse event to and/or were hesitant to receive one of the mRNA or adenovirus based COVID-19 vaccines. Although safety from clinical trials was reassuring, small trial population size, relatively low administration rates worldwide and limited post-licensure intelligence meant potential rare adverse events were underinformed. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) spontaneously reported to SAFEVAC, the integrated vaccine safety surveillance system used by Victoria and Western Australia, Australia. Reports received from 14 Feb 2022 to 30 June 2023 were analysed by vaccinee demographics, reported reactions and COVID-19 vaccine dose received and compared as reporting rates (RR) per 100,000 doses administered. Results 356 AEFI reports were received, following 102,946 Nuvaxovid doses administered. Rates were higher post dose 1 than dose 2 (rate ratio 1.5, p=0.0008); primary series than booster (rate ratio 2.4, p<0.0001); in females than males (rate ratio 1.4, p<0.01), especially those aged 30-49 years (RR=1.6, p=0.002). Serious AEFI included 76 chest pain (RR=73.8), two myocarditis (RR=1.9) and 20 pericarditis (RR=19.4). No cases of Guillain Barre or thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndromes were reported and no deaths attributable to vaccination. Conclusion The shared SAFEVAC platform enables pooling of clinically reviewed data across jurisdictions, increasing the safety profile evidence base of novel vaccines like Nuvaxovid and improving the odds for identification and description of rare events across all vaccines.
Subject(s)
Pericarditis , Chest Pain , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Thrombosis , Myocarditis , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Objective: To characterise Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected by Omicron. Design: Follow-up survey of persons testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 in Western Australia, 16 July-3 August 2022. Setting: Community Participants: 22,744 persons with COVID-19 who had agreed to participate in research at the time of diagnosis were texted a survey link 90 days later; non-responders were telephoned. Post stratification weights were applied to responses from 11,697 (51.4%) participants, 94.0% of whom had received >= 3 vaccine doses. Main outcome measures: Prevalence of Long COVID - defined as reporting new or ongoing COVID-19 illness-related symptoms or health issues 90 days post diagnosis; associated health care utilisation, reductions in work/study and risk factors were assessed using log-binomial regression. Results: 18.2% (n=2,130) of respondents met case definition for Long COVID. Female sex, being 50-69 years of age, pre-existing health issues, residing in a rural or remote area, and receiving fewer vaccine doses were significant independent predictors of Long COVID (p < 0.05). Persons with Long COVID reported a median of 6 symptoms, most commonly fatigue (70.6%) and difficulty concentrating (59.6%); 38.2% consulted a GP and 1.6% reported hospitalisation in the month prior to the survey due to ongoing symptoms. Of 1,778 respondents with Long COVID who were working/studying before their COVID-19 diagnosis, 17.9% reported reducing/discontinuing work/study. Conclusion: 90 days post Omicron infection, almost 1 in 5 respondents reported Long COVID symptoms; 1 in 15 of all persons with COVID-19 sought healthcare for associated health concerns >=2 months after the acute illness.